Renewables-2017

  Breathtaking chance of new space technology Author: David Judbarovski, systems engineering, principle inventor   judbarovski@gmail.com , Israel   Abstract Earlier invented VTOL (Vertical Take-Off and Lending devices of 40.0 kW per a ton lift) can be repeatedly used for a rocket delivery up to 50-100 km height for further acceleration. A smaller VTOL can help at Lunar and Mars missions for incredibly long and cheap and heavy transportation and for far observation and exploration The VTOL’s disclosure is in https://judbarovski.blogspot.com/2020/07   (“Take-off and Landing Device”, posted on 20 July, 2020). 5.0 ton cargo for delivery on the Moon or Mars needs 35.0 ton launching mass or 90 ton correspondingly, can carry a rocket of about 30 ton and 80 ton correspondingly. Ice and other minerals extracted in its deposits on Mars/the Moon, they can be far and quickly transported and used for the said missions. The ice can be transformed in fuels after melting and splitti

  Mr. Elon Mask, CEO and Founder Mr. Peter H. Diamands, Founder and Executive Chairmen, XPrize   Dear gentlemen, 20.04.2021 Note: 21.04.2021. I haven’t   received your emailing confirmation ysterday and now   (1) I can offer a breakthrough novel concept of flying transport suitable for Lunar , Mars etc. missions – 40 Watt/kg,, 40 kW/ton, without fuels, but   solar energy (a) Being 81 years old, I haven’t long-term plans to participate, but some intellectual assisting (b) You can see disclosure “Take-off and Landing Device”, posted on 20.07.2020 in https://judbarovski.blogspot.com/ 2020/07 and can be used for horizontal flying too. (2) About your Carbon removal for Gigaton Scaling (a) It is not possible without further transforming   it in carbon-based fuels by renewable electricity must be cheaper USD 0.001/kWh . (b) Disclosure was in my report (579f) CO2 Mass Production from the Air Very Cheaply,   https://www.aiche.org/proceedings/people/david-judbarovsk

Abstract Contrary to conventional vision, self-piloted cheap big blimps (non-rigid airships) of not-sophisticated design can be quickly 3-D maneuvered and exactly keeping its given route at variable crosswind, and I hope to prove it here. Big blimps can be much better alternative as oversea trade transport vs. shipping between Asia and Europa or America, and for India-USA it is sufficiently cheaper and faster, e.g. 100-200 hour by different routes vs. 600 -1000 hours without better alternatives. Background Oversea shipping is suffering inherently by: (1) distance and time between two terminals are very long  and/or necessary to pass such bottle-necks as Suez channel or Panama one (2) inherently  low velocity (3) necessity for cargo to be unload and stored at ports on a way to end terminal, crossing land territories such countries as Russia or direct enemies, creates headache of political nature. Disclosure for Experts A blimp is filled by gaseous ammonia at normal temper

  Much better transport for oversea trade than ships Author: Davis Judbarovski, systems engineering, principle inventor, retired judbarovski@gmail.com , Israel   Abstract Big Blimps (non rigid airships) at low pressure can be panacea and much better alternative vs. shipping between Asia and Europa or America. Between USA and India it is sufficiently cheaper and faster, e.g. 200 hour by different routes vs. 600 -1000 hours without alternatives. Being loaded and fueled by ammonia, it can carry up to 2500 ton cargo. Ammonia is not flammable, and can be made cheaply from air and water, but the last is another story.   Such shipping is suffering inherently by: (1) distance and time between two terminals are very long   and/or necessary to pass such bottle-neck as Suez channel or Panama one (2) inherent low velocity (3) necessity for cargo to be unload at ports on a way to end terminal, crossing land territories such countries as Russia or direct enemies, creates headac