Breeding for cheap energy cheapening

Breeding for cheap energy cheapening

Author: David Judbarovski, systems engineering, principle inventor, retired

judbarovski@gmail.com

 

Note:

Three different inventions promise primary renewable electricity by about USD 0.006/kWh each at 5 years payback and then to be practically free.  

They are.

(1) Solar thermal heterodyne. 2020. It allows a rectenna to be feasible at present level of rectifiers  

(2)VAWT (vertical axis wind turbine) comprising chains rotating oppositely to neighboring ones, 2016.

(3) Sailboat with hydro-generator. 2017. Its electricity is transformed on-board in hydrogen, and then in more transportable fuels  

 

Abstract:   

To reform giant business being energetics even if in favor of much cheaper electricity, it is grandiose business too with grandiose investments. A breeding model of investments described below allows both to cheapen additionally such electricity during its payback period and multiple diminish crediting it, allows 100% electricity as end energy source, and maximal autonomous powering for defense.  

 

My results were calculated in USA cents/kWh produced, and whole program is 5 years for payback and 4 years for building.

 

A credit is 3.0 cent/kWh only, and allows a power plant to recoup in a year with practically free electricity for following years. A sale is 9 cent/kWh.  The following stages are by breeding investment, allows three additional analogous power plants to build by revenue from a previous plant.

It is enough 4 years to invest and build 40 analogous power plants by first year credit of 3.0 cent/kWh.. They would produce practically free electricity since their second year work, because each one was recouped.  .  

 

Credit for 5 years for the whole program would be 3 cents/40 = 0 075 cent/ kWh.

1.22 cent/kWh for recoup vs. 3 cent/ kWh, if without breeding.  

Consume tariffs is equal to overheads only, and plus 3.7 cent/kWh during payback.

 

Really

1 + 3 + 9 + 27 = 40,

1 * 4 + 3 * 3 + 9 * 2 + 27 * 1 = 58, (40 * 3 + 58 * 0) / (40 + 58) = 1.22 cent/kWh

(9 * 40 + 58 * 0) / (40 + 58) = 3.7 cent /kWh

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Progressive city-car realization and powering-Updated,#1

Progressive city-car realization and powering-Updated, #1 Author: David Judbarovski, principle inventor, retired engineer, Israel judbarovski@gmail.com   Short CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-judbarovski-1390944a/ Archive since 2017 yr: http://judbarovski.blogspot.be Archive since 2006 yr.: http://judbarovski.livejournal.com [3791]-3/11/2017,   My three levels’ conception of progressive transportation was disclosed in http://www.judbarovski.blogspot.co.il/2017/05/progressive-transportation-manifesto.html  (Progressive transportation manifesto, May 02. 2017). Its first level is a city-car.   Special designed city-car is a car moved electrically and equipped by very small battery as a city-grid element, and it isn’t big news now. Such cars are to be much cheaper and simpler than conventional cars and save a lot of energy. But I can suppose strictly to reject all sorts of powering them from underground, because it is energy ineffective and creates additional
Read more

Equipment for Short Take-off and Landing (E-STOL)

Equipment for Short Take-off and Landing (E-STOL) Author: David Judbarovski, systems engineering, principle inventor judbarovski@gmail.com , Linkedin Abstract My E-STOL comprises a aerodynamic resistance of quite small area (SAR), being rigid and turnable, and a water jet device (WJD), comprising high pressure water jets in corners of quadrangular frame. The SAR can be very quickly erected or downed to turn it into additional wing-kite for short gliding in the sky. The WJD provides stabilization below stall speed and serves as start support, while landing or take-off. It is very attractive for Navy aviation, because allows high cruise speed, extremely short runway, and better reliability vs. helicopter, and we can repeat approach, if taking a portion of ambient sea water, in flight by simple pails.     The water is thrust out through the jets by gases at high pressure after ignition of “liquid vigorous combustible” (LVC), e.g. stoichiometric composition of amm
Read more

Breakthrough new fuel is better than oil

Breakthrough new fuel is better than oil David Judbarovski, systems engineering, principle inventor judbarovski@gmail.com Abstract Lithium hydride being reformed by water vapor in hydrogen then by fuel cell can create 5.25 kWh electricity/ kg. LiH, vs. 3.75 kWh per kg gasoline, while that LiH needs for its recycling 10.3 kWh renewable electricity , so system energy efficiency is 50% without any harmful exhaust. For the oil, analogous technology or by burning the both are followed by the oil recycling, they are 25% energy efficient with a lot of harmful exhaust.. Really For Lithium hydride, it was evaluated by me in the article : “Breakthrough kind of electric vehicle” in https://judbarovski.blogspot.com /2022/11 , posted at Nov. 05, 2022 For the oil, it is recycled from atmospheric CO2 and hydrogen produced by the water splitting.
Read more