Military value of extra-quick ship of my design


Military value of extra-quick ship of my design
Author: David Judbarovski, systems engineering, principle inventor, retired

Abstract
Being compared with typical destroyer (Type 055, Japan) = USD 60,000,000,00; 13,000 dwt; 112,000 kW; 56 km/h, and with Boeing 787-9 airliner = USD 30,000,000,00; 55 ton payload;  80,000 kW; 900 km/h, my ship is better than the said destroyer in 30 times by CAPEX and 9 times by OPEX, and can substitute 8 destroyers. Correspondingly, with the airliner, 200 times by CAPEX and 80 times by OPEX, substituting 100 them by one ship  

Very shorty,
Two key elements of my ship are
(1) Slightly lower than sea level, the ship’s nose is tilted back and like a wedge it bends the upstream water upward in the air, and it substitutes the big water resistance by the air resistance being in three orders of magnitude less one  Such energy effect is inherent for very big velocity.. It is new kind of sea ship, breaking all stereotypes.
(2) to add a thin pressed air cocoon created around a hull of the ship. It reduces the power loses by the water viscosity practically to zero.  

Power consideration for my ship
W = Q * H = ( l * B * H / T ) * H = B * H^2  * V = S * H * V (km/h) / 3.6,
Here: W (kW) – power; Q (m3/s}- water rate; H (m) – ship’s draft = nose height submerged; B (m) – ship’s nose beam submerged; S (m2) = B * H; l (m)  nose length submerged; V (m/s) – velocity = V (km/h) / 3.6; T = l / V (m/s) 
So
So W = 0.28 * S * H * V (km/h), hence a power is proportional to a speed !!!.
While for conventional ships it is W = a * S * V^3 / 2

Let a ship of my design be
H = 6 m, B = 10 m, 6500 dwt; and V = 900 km/h 
Let abovementioned air cocoon be consuming 10,000 kW

So for the said ship of my design :
W = 0.28 * 10 * 36 * 900 = 90,700 kW + ~10,000 kW (for the cocoon)
So W ~= 100,000 kW totally

If compared with the said destroyer:
(6500 /13,000) * (900/56) = 8. My one instead of the eight by total payload,
and by cost ( 8 * 60 millions) /15 millions =  32 times by CAPEX,
while 8 * 112,000 /100,000 = 9 times by OPEX   

If compared with the said airliner
(5,000/50) * (30,000,000 / 15,000,000) = 200 times cheaper CAPEX, 
and (5,000 /50) * 80,000 /100,000) = 80 times less OPEX  

So my sea transport can be out of competition for military quick response.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Progressive city-car realization and powering-Updated,#1

Progressive Transportation Manifesto

Fresh look, Japan offshore