Reverse of "climate change" by system approach

Reverse of “climate change” by system approach

Sincerely: David Judbarovski, systems engineering, principle inventor, retired

 

Reinhardt Timothy, Director, NETL DOE

timothy.reinhardt@hq.doe.gov

DE-FOA-0002515

William Ryan, Contract specialist, EERE  DOE

EERE-ExchangeSupport@hq.doe.gov

DE-FOA-0002475

 

Any respectable engineering institution has a team of analysts and futurist being think tanks to help business development. Can I hope your NETL and EERE to have them, it is for them too.

 

(1) “Zero-carbon” fuels, as ammonia as hydrogen, the both are very hazardous, while “carbon-neutral” energy technologies, if their carbon dioxide emission is fully extracted from atmosphere, it can reverse “climate change” down to levels of pre-industrial era in a few years, because of natural processes are known as “nature carbon cycle”.  

(2) Such carbon dioxide needs to be cheaper USD 30.0/ton or so, and without long transporting and storing in such huge amount, but to convert it in traditional liquid carbon based fuels, e.g. gasoline and so on, as for conventional usage, as by water reforming  to feed H2-air fuel cells can save 50% such fuels.  Recyclable artificial carbon-based fuel is a key to renewable electricity without foolish ideas of Smart Grids being a Big Folly.

See more detailed in https://www.aiche.org/academy/conferences/aiche-annual-meeting/2020/proceeding/paper/579f-co2-mass-production-air-very-cheaply

And about direct conversion of any combustible heat into electricity with energy efficiency near 100% by antenna receiver, for it Carnot limit is not relevant, see https://judbarovski.blogspot.com/2021/01/super-economical-antenna-based-engine.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Progressive city-car realization and powering-Updated,#1

Progressive Transportation Manifesto

Fresh look, Japan offshore