Renewables-2017

It was published 7 years ago. david judbarovski 26 March 2015 at 09:38 To: christian.ehler@europarl.europa.eu Bcc: jaromir.stetina@europarl.europa.eu, michael.gahler@europarl.europa.eu, anna.fotyga@europarl.europa.eu Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original Dear Herr Dr. Christian Ehler Data: 26.03.2015 I wrote you 11 days ago about dangers for EU economics and EU security a mass of VP-s with very dubious past and about insiders of Russia in your European parliament and inside EC, including EC president Juncker and EC Vice-President (Energy) Sefcovic. I can underline that my conclusions are based on actions and initiatives and not only on biography of such persons. Their beautiful initiatives in reality are very harmful by huge expences and long time. For example, Mr. Sefcovic by his "new" initiative is repeating a variant of Nabucco project has very long and very negative history, so it needs now for fresh ideas and I can offer them (see my article...

One more step to cheaper fuel of clean exhaust Author: David Judbarovski, systems engineering, principle inventor judbarovski@gmail.com, 82, retired, Israel Earlier I declared in “Hydrogen Economy”. Way from swindle to hazard-free reality. (see it posted on April 17. 2022 in https://judbarovski.blogspot.com/2022/04 ) the following: “How to turn “Hydrogen Economy” from big sell and dangerous swindle into hazard-free prosperity’. Abstract Hydrogen Economy really is one of the fakes of our age. Nevertheless, hydrogen being very explosive, if mixed with the air in any proportion, it is very attractive matter, to try to overcome the said its problem or to soften it till a level of conventional fuels, but can be more promising by environmental and economics points of view. I can suppose, some quite conventional engineering tricks allows to reach those goals.” In the above-mentioned article, there I disclosed and proved it clearly for a case of householders powering, while for cases ...

Wake up, United Kingdom ! It is impossible to imagine if during a war, a war of survival, that the prime minister of your country being by origin and even by ethnic name from the country of your mortal enemy RUSSIA, with centuries-old imperial ambitions and a bad reputation of a fascist nature, this was both before Brexit and during that time and especially to this day. His tactical tricks distract you from the essence. Wake up, United Kingdom !

New kind of transport for big countries of America Abstract It isn’t needed in special budgets for new infrastructure It can serve as regional transport, being in order of magnitude quicker than by bus, consuming fuel per passenger as a car. The main disadvantage of air transport now used, they are very expensive in production and maintenance of high safety standards. My flying vehicle is very reliable and compact, simplest and cheapest design (see “High-speed Regional Transport” in https://judbarovski.blogspot.com/2022/06, posted on June 16, 2022). Some higher energy consume is compensated by both much lower CAPEX and maintenance expenditures, short runway. Its basic variant can be 50 ton weight, 600 km/h, 45,000 kW, the both are maximum, 30,000 kW averaged, 1600 km run in 3.10 hours, with 160 seats,, 22 ton fuel. Sincerely, David Judbarovski, systems engineering, principle inventor Israel, judbarovski@gmail.com

Universe, from delusions of dualists back to common sense. David Judbarovski, systems engineering, principle inventor judbarovski@mail.com Abstract Theses of a point of view for Alexey Pasechnik, theoretic of astrophysics It supposes to reconcile opposition of the matter with spirit (1) Принцип консерватизма, или законы сохранения, и второе начало термодинамики это идеология конечности мироздания по времени, а про теории большого взрыва, не буду, чтоб не обидеть придумавших на скоро тёмные материи и энергии, которые тоже, якобы, противоречат наблюдениям, А действия равные противодействию исключают перемены и вообще, движение (2) Информация не консервативна, в смысле физического принципа сохранения, Обмен Информацией между субъектами увеличивает её у каждого из них, т.е. и её сумму в системе. В ЛЭТИ это понимание меня сразу ставило в тупик, но на экзамене по теории информации говорил по принципу советских людей говорить не то, что о всём этом думаю, а что хотят от меня слышат...

Advantages of high-speed transport of my design Author: David Judbarovski, systems engineering, principle inventor judbarovski@gmail.com The main disadvantage of high‐speed trains is that they require a huge amount of infrastructure that must be built and maintained to extremely precise standards and can’t survive, but being subsidized only. Air transport now used, is very expensive in production and maintenance of high safety standards. My flying vehicle is very compact, with very simple and cheap design (see “High-speed Regional Transport” in https://judbarovski.blogspot.com/2022/06, posted on June 16, 2022). Some higher energy consume is compensated by both much lower CAPEX and maintenance expenditures, short runway. It is about 50 ton weight, 600 km/h, 45,000 kW, the both are maximum, 30,000 kW averaged, 1600 km run in 3.10 hours, with 15 ton payload, 22 ton fuel.

High-speed regional transport Author: David Judbarovski, systems engineering, principle inventor judbarovski@gmail.com Abstract Flying vehicle being very compact, with very simple and cheap design, it is evaluated here below. Some higher energy consume is compensated by both much lower CAPEX and maintenance expenditures, short runway. I see only application niche for it to be regional transport about 50 ton weight, 600 km/h, 45,000 kW, the both maximum, 30,000 kW averaged, 1600 km run in 3.10 hours, with 15 ton payload. 22 ton fuel. It comprise a fuselage equipped by mover with turbine engine, and short hollow tubes in parallel to flight direction and bent downward at back side, so oncoming air flow creates lift force like air jets that possible with passive turbine compensating a weight of the said transport. Economics of it was evaluated by classical formulas aren’t needed in detailed explain. Really, 50 ton = 500,000 (N) = 0.4 (kg/m3) * 45 (m2) * 167 (m/s) ^2 , ~45,000 ...